I didn’t think I was going to like it. But I do. By the way, if you’re one of those people who immediately scrolls down to the bottom of any review to see if the person recommends – or doesn’t recommend – what they’re reviewing, allow me to save any strain on your finger-scrolling-muscle and say: Give it a try. You’ll like it.

Before jumping into the benefits and drawbacks, let me start by saying I’m a big fan of using a physical Bible for reading, studying, and preaching. (If you preach or teach the Bible, please read this post.) If you are planning to hunker down in a specific book of the Bible, I would still encourage you to put your tablet, smartphone, or computer away, grab a physical Bible, and dive in.

However…a Bible Read Thru is different from a Bible Study.

In case you’ve just stumbled across this blog, I’ve been doing a Rapid Bible Read Thru for the first four months of every year since 2010. (In 2017 I wrote a book about the What, Why, and How of doing a Rapid Bible Read Thru. You can read reviews or grab a copy right here.) While I’ve read different translations each time, a few years ago was the first time I used a tablet as my primary reading Bible.

NOTE: There are lots of Bible apps out there. Since the free YouVersion Bible App is the one I used – and the most popular Bible app in the world – that’s the one I will reference for this post. However, the same benefits and drawbacks apply no matter which app you choose.

First…the 5 Benefits

1. I spend less time looking up the passages.

My favorite way to do a Rapid Bible Read Thru is chronologically. (You can see my four favorite chronological plans – and even download a free printable plan – by clicking here.)

Since there are lots of times when books overlap, you can end up spending time switching back and forth instead of reading. Having the whole plan laid out for you keeps you immersed in the narrative. (Hmmm…sort of the purpose of a Rapid Bible Read Thru!)

Here are 5 Benefits (and 3 Drawbacks) of using a Bible App for a Rapid Bible Read Thru.

Click To Tweet

2. I am not tempted to look at the notes in my study Bible.

Do you see a bold “a” in your Bible and feel a moral obligation to go down to the bottom of the page and read the note? I call this ping-pong reading. Read a little bit. “Ping” down to the notes. “Pong” back up to the text. And on and on it goes.

With the Bible App, there are no notes at the bottom of each chapter. Occasionally, there is an “a” or “b,” but you have to click it to be taken to the note. For some reason, that’s nowhere near as tempting for me. Once again…I remain in the Word. Lovely.

3. Copy/Paste makes note-taking much quicker.

I try to take very few notes when I’m doing a Rapid Bible Read Thru. That said, when I do take notes, being able to tap…copy…paste is quick and gets me back to reading. (Do you see a pattern here?)

4. I can supplement my reading with listening.

Every year, someone tells me they’re doing an entire Rapid Bible Read Thru using the audio Bible embedded into their Bible app. While this certainly isn’t “bad,” I highly recommend using an audio Bible as a supplement…not a replacement. (More on that topic in this post and this post.)

I love listening to the Bible. Sometimes I’ll take sections (like Psalms for example) and simply listen to a few while I drive, mow the lawn, or walk home after dropping my daughter at school. Seeing it on the page AND hearing it helps me engage with the Word…and remember it.

5. It’s always with me.

I don’t carry a physical Bible and a printout of my chronological reading plan with me all the time. On the flip side, it’s extremely rare that I don’t have my smartphone, my tablet, or my computer with me.

The YouVersion Bible App stays synchronized across all three of those devices. While I do a vast majority of my reading at home in the early morning, it is nice to be able to pick up right where I left off if I find myself early for an appointment, sitting in an airport, or having missed some of my reading earlier that day.

Now…the 3 Drawbacks

1. It is TOO easy to get distracted.

As I mentioned, the Bible App is with me whether I have my phone, tablet, or computer. That also means so is email, social media, to-do reminders, etc. I am guessing you know how incredibly distracting these can be. Even when our desire is to meet with the Living God. One little “ding” and our eyes and mind are somewhere else. Ugh.

You might not know this, but every smartphone or tablet I’ve ever seen has a quick way to turn off notifications. On Apple devices, it’s called “Do Not Disturb.” On Android devices, it’s called “Blocking Mode.” Turn. It. On.

2. It is only setup for a full year.

This isn’t a huge thing, but it would be nice to customize it for four months (or any amount of time other than a full year). Better yet, I’d love to simply have it scroll to the next section in chronological order without breaking it up into amount-per-day at all! I took this screenshot back in 2015 when I was almost halfway through my Rapid Bible Read Thru. As you can see from the picture below, the plan thought I was on May 15th. (I actually took the screenshot on February 16.)

When it’s broken up into “days” it is extremely easy to get into a check-this-off-my-to-do-list mentality. That’s why I highly encourage you to read for an amount of time not an amount of content. This obviously isn’t an insurmountable obstacle, but it would be nice not to have to think about it at all.

3. It’s less “special.”

Ok…hear me out. We live in a digital age. That’s not going to change. More books are read digitally every year. More movies are streamed. More pictures are taken on phones (and almost never printed).

Holding a book while you read feels different. And a Bible feels even more different than any other book.

Something about holding a Bible helps me connect with the story – and the Author – in a different, unique, special way. That connection doesn’t seem to happen as deeply when I read a digital Bible.

Finally…HOW I used it.

The Tools

The YouVersion Bible App. I have it installed on all my devices.
OneNote. I like it better than Evernote, although both are terrific, come on every platform, and they’re both free.
Coffee.

The Process

As I mentioned in the bulleted list above, I do nearly all my reading on my tablet. Since the OneNote app is on the same tablet (and my phone and my computer), I usually don’t have anything else with me – except my coffee.

I open OneNote and the Bible App right at the start so I can switch between the two without any lag time.

When it comes to taking notes, I have three methods I use:

When you tap a verse (or verses), a bunch of options appear at the top. (Sharing on Facebook/Twitter, highlighting, add notes, etc.). I ignore them all except the one that says “copy.” Tap that, switch to OneNote, hit “paste” and the whole verse – with the reference – is right there in my notes.
Sometimes I want to take a note or jot a thought or application. In that case, I usually just pop over to OneNote, write the Scripture reference (so I can find it later), and jot a quick note.
Color-coding. Once I’ve either copied the verse or written my note in OneNote, occasionally I will highlight the note with one of two colors. Yellow means “I want to share this with my Tuesday morning group.” Red means “I want to study/internalize this after I’m done with the Bible Read Thru.

That’s it. Pretty simple. But as I’ve said many times, “Simple gets applied. Complicated gets set aside.”

Simple gets applied. Complicated gets set aside. #MakeItStick

Click To Tweet

What do you like – or dislike – about reading a digital Bible?

Share3

3 Shares

gary says

February 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM

I am a former Christian. I loved being a Christian. I loved Jesus and I loved the Bible. I used to love witnessing to non-believers and loved defending my belief in (the Christian) God and orthodox/conservative Christianity. Then one day someone challenged me to take a good, hard look at the foundation of my beliefs: the Bible. I was stunned by what I discovered.

1. The Bible is not inerrant. It contains many, many errors, contradictions, and deliberate alterations and additions by the scribes who copied it. The originals are lost, therefore we have no idea what “God” originally” said. Yes, its true—Christians can give “harmonizations” for every alleged error and contradiction, but so can the Muslims for errors in the Koran, and Mormons for errors in the Book of Mormon. One can harmonize anything if you allow for the supernatural.

2. How do we know that the New Testament is the Word of God? Did Jesus leave a list of inspired books? Did the Apostles? Paul? The answer is, no. The books of the New Testament were added to the canon over several hundred years. Second Peter was not officially accepted into the canon until almost the FIFTH century! So why do all Christians accept every book of the New Testament as the word of God and reject every non-canonical “gospel”? Answer: the ancient (catholic) Church voted these books into your Bible. Period.

There is nowhere in the OT or the NT where God gives men the authority to determine what is and what is not his Word. If Second Peter was really God’s Word, the entire Church should have known so in the first century.

3. Who wrote the Gospels? We have NO idea! The belief that they were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is based on hearsay and assumptions—catholic tradition. Protestants denounce most of the traditions of the Catholic Church but have retained two of the most blatant, evidence-lacking traditions, which have no basis in historical fact or in the Bible: the canon of the NT and the authorship of the Gospels.

The only shred of evidence that Christians use to support the traditional authorship of the Gospels is one brief statement by a guy named Papias in 130 AD that someone told him that John Mark had written a gospel. That’s it! Papias did not even identify this “gospel”. Yet in 180 AD, Irenaeus, a bishop in FRANCE, declares to the world that the apostles Matthew and John and the associates of Peter and Paul—Mark and Luke—wrote the Gospels. But Irenaeus gives ZERO evidence for his assignment of authorship to these four books. It is well known to historians that it was a common practice at that time for anonymously written books to be ascribed to famous people to give them more authority. For all we know, this is what Irenaeus did in the case of the Gospels.

The foundation of the Christian Faith is the bodily resurrection of Jesus. If the story of the Resurrection comes from four anonymous books, three of which borrow heavily from the first, often word for word, how do we know that the unheard of, fantastically supernatural, story of the re-animation of a first century dead man, actually happened??

Maybe the first book written, “Mark”, was written for the same purpose that most books were written in that time period—for the benefit of one wealthy benefactor, and maybe it was written simply as an historical novel, like Homer’s Iliad; not meant to be 100% factual in every detail, but a mix of true historical events as a background, with a real messiah pretender in Palestine, Jesus, but with myth and fiction added to embellish the story and help sell the book! We just do not know for what purpose these books were written!

I slowly came to realize that there is zero verifiable evidence for the Resurrection, and, the Bible is not a reliable document. After four months of desperate attempts to save my faith, I came to the sad conclusion that my faith was based on an ancient superstition; a superstition not based on lies, but based on the sincere but false beliefs of uneducated, superstitious, first century peasants.

Comments

Beatrice says
February 20, 2015 at 2:08 AM

I use the YouVersion on my phone for my devotions in the morning. I like it because I’m not a morning person. It takes me a while to get moving, I may be awake but not up. Using a digital Bible means I can read my Bible in bed without getting up or turning on the lights-meaning I don’t waste my morning time. For the first time I’m also using a digital devotional. I used the 21-day devotion from YouVersion at the beginning of the year, then did a 28-day “Power of Same” and now I’m doing N.T. Wright’s 53-day “Lent for Everyone” that runs until a little after Easter.

- Keith says
  February 23, 2015 at 10:14 AM
  
  I haven’t used the YouVersion devotionals, but it sure looks like there are lots of options! I am not doing N.T. Wright’s “Lent for Everyone” this year. I have read parts of it in the past and it’s always very thought-provoking. Thanks Beatrice.
  
  - Daphne says
    January 31, 2018 at 9:40 AM
    
    Good article. I like doing devotions in youversion. I also enjoy being in my Bible. It’s a physical place. I know a particular verse is near the end of the first chapter of a book, and I can find the verse that way when I might not remember its address. I also enjoy devotions in my Bible when I use devotional books. But, as I’ve gotten older my wrists hurt from holding the Bible if I’m in it for awhile. I also stopped carrying it to church for that reason and because it’s heavy. I’m not as steady on my feet as I used to be, so I travel light as much as possible, especially when I have had to walk with a cane. When using my Bible I often gather a few versions, sit in my recliner, bring something to drink, put my feet up, and prop my Bible up on a small pillow so I can read without holding it, and I’m all set.
    
    I like your suggestion from having read your previous articles to turn my device on airplane mode . That’s a great idea! Yeah, the cutting and pasting is easier on a device, for sure.
    
    Oh, another benefit to reading from a device is that if my eyes are tired I can make the font larger.
    
    Thanks for all the good information.
    
gary says
February 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM

I am a former Christian. I loved being a Christian. I loved Jesus and I loved the Bible. I used to love witnessing to non-believers and loved defending my belief in (the Christian) God and orthodox/conservative Christianity. Then one day someone challenged me to take a good, hard look at the foundation of my beliefs: the Bible. I was stunned by what I discovered.

1. The Bible is not inerrant. It contains many, many errors, contradictions, and deliberate alterations and additions by the scribes who copied it. The originals are lost, therefore we have no idea what “God” originally” said. Yes, its true—Christians can give “harmonizations” for every alleged error and contradiction, but so can the Muslims for errors in the Koran, and Mormons for errors in the Book of Mormon. One can harmonize anything if you allow for the supernatural.

2. How do we know that the New Testament is the Word of God? Did Jesus leave a list of inspired books? Did the Apostles? Paul? The answer is, no. The books of the New Testament were added to the canon over several hundred years. Second Peter was not officially accepted into the canon until almost the FIFTH century! So why do all Christians accept every book of the New Testament as the word of God and reject every non-canonical “gospel”? Answer: the ancient (catholic) Church voted these books into your Bible. Period.

There is nowhere in the OT or the NT where God gives men the authority to determine what is and what is not his Word. If Second Peter was really God’s Word, the entire Church should have known so in the first century.

3. Who wrote the Gospels? We have NO idea! The belief that they were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is based on hearsay and assumptions—catholic tradition. Protestants denounce most of the traditions of the Catholic Church but have retained two of the most blatant, evidence-lacking traditions, which have no basis in historical fact or in the Bible: the canon of the NT and the authorship of the Gospels.

The only shred of evidence that Christians use to support the traditional authorship of the Gospels is one brief statement by a guy named Papias in 130 AD that someone told him that John Mark had written a gospel. That’s it! Papias did not even identify this “gospel”. Yet in 180 AD, Irenaeus, a bishop in FRANCE, declares to the world that the apostles Matthew and John and the associates of Peter and Paul—Mark and Luke—wrote the Gospels. But Irenaeus gives ZERO evidence for his assignment of authorship to these four books. It is well known to historians that it was a common practice at that time for anonymously written books to be ascribed to famous people to give them more authority. For all we know, this is what Irenaeus did in the case of the Gospels.

The foundation of the Christian Faith is the bodily resurrection of Jesus. If the story of the Resurrection comes from four anonymous books, three of which borrow heavily from the first, often word for word, how do we know that the unheard of, fantastically supernatural, story of the re-animation of a first century dead man, actually happened??

Maybe the first book written, “Mark”, was written for the same purpose that most books were written in that time period—for the benefit of one wealthy benefactor, and maybe it was written simply as an historical novel, like Homer’s Iliad; not meant to be 100% factual in every detail, but a mix of true historical events as a background, with a real messiah pretender in Palestine, Jesus, but with myth and fiction added to embellish the story and help sell the book! We just do not know for what purpose these books were written!

I slowly came to realize that there is zero verifiable evidence for the Resurrection, and, the Bible is not a reliable document. After four months of desperate attempts to save my faith, I came to the sad conclusion that my faith was based on an ancient superstition; a superstition not based on lies, but based on the sincere but false beliefs of uneducated, superstitious, first century peasants.

- Keith says
  February 19, 2015 at 1:34 PM
  
  Wow! That’s quite a thorough comment. I’m really saddened that your exploration caused you to leave your faith behind. While I have not found this comments section to be a healthy place for debate/long answers/etc. I would encourage you to check out these two posts I have written in the past:
  
  https://keithferrin.com/28-my-6-favorite-books-for-skeptics
  
  https://keithferrin.com/free-resource-guide-answering-tough-questions
  
  I sincerely pray you will revisit your examination of the Bible and the resurrection.

5 Benefits (and 3 Drawbacks) of Using a Bible App for a Rapid Bible Read Thru

NOTE: There are lots of Bible apps out there. Since the free YouVersion Bible App is the one I used – and the most popular Bible app in the world – that’s the one I will reference for this post. However, the same benefits and drawbacks apply no matter which app you choose.

First…the 5 Benefits

1. I spend less time looking up the passages.

2. I am not tempted to look at the notes in my study Bible.

3. Copy/Paste makes note-taking much quicker.